As you read each of the points below, decide whether they fit what you already know about replacement hiring (write RH on the line) or succession planning (SP). Discuss each point with your group to determine any subtle differences, areas of overlap, or questions that may arise.
|
Description |
SP or RH? |
Notes |
|
Quick answer to immediate need |
RH |
|
|
Long-term commitment |
SP |
Like the stock market. |
|
Developing individuals |
SP |
To grow and mentor them toward new opportunities. |
|
Based on current job descriptions |
RH |
Usually described by incumbent and immediate supervisor. |
|
Based on new directions and expanded responsibilities to the job description |
SP |
The job description can be developed by multiple resources and with input from a variety of sources. |
|
Uses input from the incumbent and supervisor |
RH |
|
|
Uses input from multiple perspectives and resources |
SP |
|
|
May offer advancement within the organization as a reward or result of seniority |
RH |
For example, receiving promotion to team lead based on having the most seniority of anyone else on the team. |
|
Considers whether right person is in the right role and merits advancement |
SP |
People are not promoted based on the amount of time spent in a particular role or organization. |
|
Addresses developmental needs of an individual to ensure success in current and future roles |
SP |
|
|
Is integrated with recruiting, training development, and diversity factors |
SP |
|
|
Must usually be done quickly and is not consistently coordinated with other human resources activities |
RH |
|
|
Can lead to finding the best person available at the moment |
RH |
Often means a warm body in the right seat. |
|
Focuses on the best candidate for the position |
SP |
Is more time consuming and costly, but with far greater benefits. |

